Reader route · probability

Follow the event, filtration, and kernel.

The probability layer moves from nonnegative supermartingales and e-processes to common high-probability events for posterior families, then to path measures generated by history-dependent or Markov kernels.

Proof spine

  1. Build an exponential process from conditional moment control.
  2. Use Ville-style maximal control or a weighted event allocation.
  3. Apply a PAC-Bayes change of measure on the same outer event.
  4. Substitute a path-dependent posterior or catalog selector only after the common event is established.
  5. For stationary targets, add a finite-depth Poisson correction under contraction.

The repository contains both process-level and event-level theorems. A simultaneous event indexed by all integer times is not automatically an e-process statement; the site keeps those routes separate.

Routes through the API

  • E-process foundations

    Nonnegative supermartingale constructions, Type-I control, and optional continuation at the process layer.

  • Sequential umbrella

    Filtrations, conditional means, and reusable sequential concentration mechanisms.

  • Finite joint model--strategy posterior

    A product prior and joint finite posterior place both selections inside one common PAC-Bayes event; the factorized corollary separates their KL costs.

  • Countable predictable-strategy e-process

    A normalized countable mixture covers a fixed catalog of predictable strategies; the common event permits later selection of an atom with its explicit weight penalty.

  • Countable sleeping-expert master

    The exact finite active prefix and closed-form unit-wealth tail equal the real infinite mixture; the resulting predictable master is an e-process when the declared expert wealth processes are.

  • History-dependent trajectory measure

    Kernels may depend on the entire finite prefix; the capstone shown here begins from a deterministic state.

  • Growing-prefix trajectory oracle

    The observable finite-state specialization selects the exact boundary within the reporting-time tilt prefix, compares monitored conditional loss with empirical prequential loss, and supplies an LIL-order envelope.

  • Arbitrary-measurable trajectory oracle

    A joint score-measurability contract supports path-selected continuous posterior measures, arbitrary measurable state and hypothesis spaces, and exact selection over a growing countable tilt prefix.

  • Poisson bridge to stationary risk

    A logarithmic depth schedule balances finite-depth correction and trajectory uncertainty under explicit contraction and a supplied bound on centered row-risk oscillation.

  • Empirical transition layer

    Coordinate-wise transition confidence transfers candidate contraction to the true kernel on the selected event.

  • Countable transition layer

    One event covers every atom in a predeclared geometric tilt catalog; vanishing normalized budgets remain conditional on positive row frequencies and candidate discrepancy convergence.

  • 20-state worked application

    The opt-in finite-state receipt makes the event-membership and numerical-comparison boundaries explicit.

Quantifiers that matter

  • One event, many choices: data-dependent substitution is valid only when the choice appears after membership in the shared good event.
  • Finite versus countable: hypothesis spaces, tilt catalogs, state spaces, and time indices have different finiteness assumptions.
  • Selection versus mixing: the predictable-strategy catalog is mixed before observation; the reported strategy atom and posterior may then be selected on the common event. This does not create an e-process from the selected atom.
  • Known versus estimated dynamics: the Poisson endpoint takes a kernel and invariant PMF; the empirical catalog adds a separate transition-confidence budget.
  • Existence versus uniqueness: the canonical finite invariant PMF exists without strict contraction, while uniqueness is explicitly conditional on the selected contraction coefficient being below one.

Next step

Inspect the stochastic-dynamics umbrella.

Use doc-gen search for a declaration, then follow its imported mechanism modules to reconstruct the event.